Thank you for your thoroughness and impartiality with this article.
I have been deep-researching Zeolite for over a year... initially for a guy doing a documentary then for my own investigations.
This is an incredibly nuanced niche however the more I have uncovered and connected the more shocked and appalled I have been at the bald-faced con that this industry is.
Everyone so far that has spoken against Zeolite brings a piece of the puzzle to the table... what I have done is combine everyone's various discoveries in different facets and discovered numerous of my own shocking smoking guns.
I can easily prove that all the talking points in defense of Zeolite are complete lies:
"Zeolite is inert": false
"Zeolite doesn't break down in the stomach": false
"The aluminum isn't bioavailable": false
"Zeolite is an intelligent binder": neither fully true nor fully false
It would be laughable at how easily these companies and gurus get away with lying IF so many people weren't hurt every week.
Thank you Zac for your comments. I read one of your substack posts on zeolite and appreciate your deep dive into zeolite products. I’m usually hesitant with anything that boasts miraculous results but I at first fell into the zeolite detox narrative with many reputable big health names selling these products. But I’ve decided to forego them for myself and for clients due to uncertainty.
Yes, that is what it indicates. But the negative comment on the specific zeolite product was in reference to adding the zeolite product directly to the urine then using that urine sample to look at heavy metal urine content. What they were saying was that this particular zeolite product contained large quantities of heavy metals. Thus, if you consumed it, you would be adding heavy metals into the body.
Why do they need to first add zeolite to urine to measure the metal content of zeolite? And if they're going to do so, shouldn't they first establish the metals in the urine first, to establish the baseline without the zeolite?
Joy they did. If you watch the video at the link I provided, they explain they looked at the heavy metal content in the urine before and after adding the zeolite product. Hence, their concern after the zeolite was added. It's important to know if these products work due to rising autism rates that can be related to rising adjuvant burden.
Hi Karen,
Thank you for your thoroughness and impartiality with this article.
I have been deep-researching Zeolite for over a year... initially for a guy doing a documentary then for my own investigations.
This is an incredibly nuanced niche however the more I have uncovered and connected the more shocked and appalled I have been at the bald-faced con that this industry is.
Everyone so far that has spoken against Zeolite brings a piece of the puzzle to the table... what I have done is combine everyone's various discoveries in different facets and discovered numerous of my own shocking smoking guns.
I can easily prove that all the talking points in defense of Zeolite are complete lies:
"Zeolite is inert": false
"Zeolite doesn't break down in the stomach": false
"The aluminum isn't bioavailable": false
"Zeolite is an intelligent binder": neither fully true nor fully false
It would be laughable at how easily these companies and gurus get away with lying IF so many people weren't hurt every week.
If you want to talk, reach out on Substack or TG: https://t.me/powerofthepulse
Thank you for your efforts.
Thank you Zac for your comments. I read one of your substack posts on zeolite and appreciate your deep dive into zeolite products. I’m usually hesitant with anything that boasts miraculous results but I at first fell into the zeolite detox narrative with many reputable big health names selling these products. But I’ve decided to forego them for myself and for clients due to uncertainty.
Could the high metals in the urine be a symptom of detox? I mean, if metals are being removed, it has to go somewhere OUT of the body. Right?
Yes, that is what it indicates. But the negative comment on the specific zeolite product was in reference to adding the zeolite product directly to the urine then using that urine sample to look at heavy metal urine content. What they were saying was that this particular zeolite product contained large quantities of heavy metals. Thus, if you consumed it, you would be adding heavy metals into the body.
Why do they need to first add zeolite to urine to measure the metal content of zeolite? And if they're going to do so, shouldn't they first establish the metals in the urine first, to establish the baseline without the zeolite?
Seems a very unproductive method of measurement.
Joy they did. If you watch the video at the link I provided, they explain they looked at the heavy metal content in the urine before and after adding the zeolite product. Hence, their concern after the zeolite was added. It's important to know if these products work due to rising autism rates that can be related to rising adjuvant burden.