I look at Yahoo News articles because they give me a glimpse into some of the biased untruths and deceptions spouted daily.
I am hopeful that, with the new administration in place in 2025, we will begin to hold some corporations and government agencies responsible for the harm caused by our modern-day healthcare (sick care) system.
Yahoo News had this article about how heart attacks are rare in younger people, but rates are rising.
Rahhal stated that the rate of heart attacks for people between the ages of 18-44 has risen by 66% in the past four years.
The reasons provided were:
Obesity (Me: Did we not have rising obesity rates among younger people before 2020?)
Stress, smoking, and diabetes (Me: It is interesting how the author added smoking to the list for the rise in heart attacks when smoking in younger adults dropped from 19.2% in 2011 to 4.9% in 2022).
Younger men are lost to the healthcare system. The article explains that young men do not see a medical doctor as often as young women. (Me: I think this one is accurate.)
Covid (Me: if you look at the unbiased data, this is not a fully accurate statement). The author stated this about C19 and heart attacks:
During the first two years of the COVID pandemic, there were 30% more heart attack deaths than would be expected among people between ages 25 and 44, one study found.
Another study estimated that 4 out of every 100 people in the U.S. develop some heart-related symptom in the year after they recover from COVID.
I did not read the studies cited, but my questions are:
How many of those people who experienced the heart attack experienced it AFTER a C19 injection, NOT BEFORE?
The first study included data from the first two years. How much of that data was from post-injection?
The second study cited data collection one year after illness. What would this number be even if we omit C19 since CVD is the number one cause of death and rates of obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes continue to rise, which are CVD risk factors? (The 4 out of every 100 may be the same even if you omit C19).
Nowhere in the Yahoo News article was it suggested or even considered that the C19 injections could be one explanation for the rising rate of heart attacks.
It is not surprising that the effects of the injection were not considered. Thoene (2024) stated this in their review paper.
Results and discussion:
From 2020 to 2024, the literature has gone from claiming there are absolutely no SAEs from mRNA based vaccines (2020/2021) to an acknowledgment of a significant number of various SAEs (2023/2024); including but not limited to neurological complications, myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombosis.
Conclusions:
The early scientific literature was biased, so as not to report SAEs, due to social and political concerns and overwhelming corporate greed. Only in the last year have scientists been able to publish articles that acknowledge a high number of SAEs linked to mRNA based vaccines. This should act as a warning that science should be completely objective when evaluating health risks, but can often be influenced by social and economic considerations.
And then there is this article by Nick Hunt in which he said
Worryingly, the abstract which I have just found online doesn’t look good at all:
the vaccinated cohort have at least 23-40% higher risk of some heart-related conditions; and
the risk is higher than in Pfizer’s previous report (i.e., it is increasing over time since vaccination).
Yet, I still see articles like these almost daily:
An 11-year-old healthy girl “apparently” had an unknown heart condition and died in her sleep.
This news station co-anchor, again, apparently very healthy, unexpectedly died in his sleep.
Or the 4 teenage runners in TN who all died while running within months of each other. In the video clip, the doctor skirts over the C19 injection question and responds by saying we need to look at “everything” and then goes into the benefits of getting a sports physical every year.
Or this middle school-age boy in TN who died of cardiac arrest while playing football
I do not recall seeing stories such as these daily before the past few years.
I just finished watching the Darkhorse interview with McKernan. Brett and Kevin discuss the contaminated DNA that McKernan and associates found in unopened/sealed C19 injection vials, which I am sure you are familiar with at this point.
But McKernan also mentions that he is seeing a rise in rare childhood cancers.
As I have said before, most illnesses are multifactorial and cannot be attributed to “one thing.” However, one factor may be more significant than others and be the fuel the fire needs to rage.
Do you think the people authoring these news articles are seeing the patterns and understand what is causing the deaths but are not speaking out, or do you think they genuinely think the injections have nothing to do with it?
Personally, based on some people that I know, I think they do not see the relationship between deaths and injections because they refuse to.
Thank you for reading my posts!
Show my posts some love, please!
It is just me writing, reading, researching, and seeing clients!
I do not use mainstream social media, so please share my posts so that more people can get informed on how to get and stay healthy.
This is NOT information allopathic practitioners will share with you.
I think with RFK Jr in the Trump administration we'll see some good things happen (this also makes me think that Trump knows he got rolled in 2020 by the CDC and pharma). But to see any change in the MSM, their pharma advertising revenue stream will have to be eliminated.
IDK if I've linked to this before in your comments, but this is pretty damning evidence of what a catastrophe the clot shots have been.
https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/