Sounds like researchers are running out of ways to hide cancer drug poisonings/killings in their papers and steer away from pharmaceuticals/naturopathic methods that actually work.
Problem is, in academia, they are still instructed to follow the peer-reviewed literature in "esteemed" journals even though those are the articles that may be the ones that are filled with faulty information.
Pharma bankrolls the medical journals, so they've become just another advertising venue for them. And don't even get me started on our public serpents in the various health departments.
I completely agree. The smaller journals that do not get as much press or attention may be the place to seek more trustworthy information (but still not the data).
Sounds like researchers are running out of ways to hide cancer drug poisonings/killings in their papers and steer away from pharmaceuticals/naturopathic methods that actually work.
Problem is, in academia, they are still instructed to follow the peer-reviewed literature in "esteemed" journals even though those are the articles that may be the ones that are filled with faulty information.
Pharma bankrolls the medical journals, so they've become just another advertising venue for them. And don't even get me started on our public serpents in the various health departments.
I completely agree. The smaller journals that do not get as much press or attention may be the place to seek more trustworthy information (but still not the data).