This is why under our current system we can never have true informed consent for vaccines. It is probably not for the reason you think.
How deep the deception goes. Understanding it is powerful.
What is in a vaccine? Why should you care?
Even if you plan on never receiving another injection, do you know what has been put into your body?
What if, in the future, these ingredients are put into you unknowingly (i.e., think of people who received a C19 injection while under anesthesia or via shedding)?
Use this article to explain to those who tell you that any vaccine is safe that a safe vaccine is purely myth.
Did you know the vaccine ingredients provided via the CDC or the FDA are only a partial list?
When you get any injection/vaccine, you are playing Russian roulette with your health since there is no way for you to know all the ingredients that will go directly into your bloodstream.
We have been forced to get unknown ingredients injected into us because the FDA has determined it is safe for adults, infants, and children.
That would be like going to a grocery store, reading the ingredient label of a box of cookies, and leaving out five of the ten ingredients.
This is a helpful chart of ingredients that we know of
This chart on Open VAERs lists vaccine ingredients in an easy-to-read and understand chart. This PDF, which uses CDC information, is also helpful for identifying vaccine ingredients. To create the chart on Open VAERs, they also relied on this FDA site to obtain ingredients.
Making this chart took considerable effort, and the creators also realized there are unknown vaccine ingredients.
The reason why the public is not informed on every ingredient in vaccines
Vaccine ingredients are kept secret from the public (the FDA knows the complete list). Manufacturers defend this by saying that if the entire list was known, others could steal their vaccine “recipe.”
The FDA will then decide if the vaccine is safe, and the CDC will choose where to include it in the vaccine schedule.
Therefore, these government agencies decide what is best for you and withhold information from you.
Vaccine ingredients and amounts that are kept hidden from us
Dr. Krause, a whistleblower and previous FDA employee for over 30 years, resigned in August 2021 over concerns that the C19 injections were being rushed into approval before September 2021.
In this Midwestern doctor's Substack, there is a link to a recent Krause interview. (I had difficulty listening all the way through, as there were repeatedly many “ums” from both parties.) Krause is a vaccine supporter and still believes (still?) that the injection benefits outweigh the risks, which added to my listening difficulty because, at this point, I cannot understand how anyone can say there are benefits to getting it.
But I want to point out that around the 39-minute mark, Krause explains that all vaccines contain proprietary ingredients that the FDA does not have to share with the public or anyone else.
This means that whatever is listed in the Open VAERs charts above is based on the public vaccine ingredient list and does not identify possibly a whole host of vaccine ingredients that we may never be aware of unless independent sources do testing.
Thankfully for us, there are independent researchers.
What researchers found when they examined C19 injection ingredients
Various researchers worldwide used Scanning Electron Microscopy Coupled with Energy-Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) to discover that the C19 injections contain 24 undeclared chemical elements.
The researchers of this study expanded on these findings to examine six C19 injection brands.
Among the undeclared chemical elements, they found not 24 but 55 in all of the vaccines examined.
These unlisted ingredients are not present by chance or coincidence but have been intentionally added to the injections. Otherwise, you would not find these similarities amongst all the different brands examined.
The greenmedinfo.com site put some ingredients found into a list with links indicating their effects on the human body.
You can refer back to the study to see which vaccines were examined, from which lots, and the results for each one tested.
Heavy Metals:
Arsenic: Detected in 82% of the samples analyzed
Mercury: Present in 6% of the samples
Chromium: Found in 100% of the samples
Copper: Detected in 47% of the samples
Radioactive Elements:
Uranium: Discovered in trace amounts in some samples
Other Metals of Concern:
Gallium: Present in 88% of the samples
Strontium: Found in 76% of the samples
Barium: Detected in 71% of the samples
Molybdenum: Present in 35% of the samples
Nickel: Found in 59% of the samples
Titanium: Detected in 35% of the samples
Rare Earth Elements:
The study also found 11 of the 15 lanthanides, including cerium, lanthanum, and gadolinium, which are often used in electronic devices and have uncertain effects on human health.
Read this article to understand how deep the deception goes between the FDA and large pharmaceutical companies.
But here are a few key points:
Around 75% of information from the official FDA Chemistry Manufacturing and Controls report are redacted to the point that nobody other than the FDA or manufacturers could ever independently test COVID mRNA shots using validated FDA testing methodology.
This means there is no way of knowing if one vial is the same as the next.
I wrote about this in a Substack post about researchers who tested the aluminum levels in vaccines based on the amounts listed on product inserts. The amounts were inconsistent, with some vials significantly exceeding the aluminum levels noted on the package insert.
When it comes to mRNA injections for COVID, Americans are 100% dependent on the FDA and vaccine manufacturers to assess and confirm purity and consistency.
That might be okay if the testing methodologies that manufacturers and the FDA use were still fully transparent, but they’re not anymore.
Not only are the test results confidential, even the methodology used hasn’t been made public. The world just has to take manufacturers’ word that there’s no contamination or variability with the mRNA sequence or its lipid nanoparticle components—even though published epidemiology data indicate otherwise.
They want to keep everything about the process and the finished product secret from the public, but they expect you to support injecting these mystery products into your bloodstream.
The shocking part to me is that most people trust the FDA and Big Pharma and blindly get these injections.
Also troubling is the fact that in 2021, the FDA opted to start monitoring America’s pharmaceutical quality via a remote collection of “mailed-in” drug samples—a far less reliable process than testing samples directly collected at manufacturing plants or distribution points by FDA officials.
This “mail-in” sampling methodology is absurd.
It would be akin to a state health department monitoring restaurants by requesting them to periodically mail in various items from their menu to be tested for potential food-born contamination or asking restaurants to promise to test the items themselves.
Why did they switch the testing process? Is it because they will find fewer safety concerns with this new and ineffective process?
Unlike every other FDA-approved pharmaceutical, including a previously approved RNA-based products including patisiran (Onpattro®), none of the COVID injections provide the sequence, molecular weight and milligram strength on its official FDA package label.
Normally, official FDA package labeling provides specifics of the actual ingredients in that volume, including the structure/sequence and specific concentration.
In the Drugs.com database, you will see how all labels provide structure and/or molecular weight in their official package labeling. COVID mRNA shots are a conspicuous exception to the historical FDA approval practice and “truthful label” rule.
At this point, it should be clear that the FDA and pharmaceutical companies can hide much information from you while the FDA assures you that they have deemed the products safe for everyone.
This means that the informed consent sheet you sign will NOT have any of this hidden information. The medical practitioner can legally reassure you the product is safe without revealing the dangers.
More reasons not to trust vaccine manufacturers and the people who support and push vaccines.
In this whistleblower interview with Sharyl Attinksson, you learn that Merck added more live viruses to their MMR vaccine so that if the vaccine degraded, it would still contain the live virus.
Apparently, no one wanted to research or understand the consequences of getting an injection with that added amount before degradation. Lab officials were told to change the data rather than recall degraded vials. The FDA was notified of data falsification, but they did not care; thus, no consequences for Merck—typical outcome.
Lastly, the whistleblower sued Merck on the argument that the CDC and the taxpayers were misled about these vaccines. After 14 years, the case was settled, and it was determined that since the CDC knew of the fraud conducted and still purchased the MMR vaccines, it was all legal, and therefore, no one was misled.
My head is spinning as I try to understand that logic. Please watch the short video clip and see if the outcomes make sense. Show them this video clip if anyone tells you the CDC is looking out for you.
But there is more you need to understand
I have watched several JJ Couey videos, such as this one, and I have difficulty understanding his interviews. I do not grasp much of what he says.
However, he stressed that the C19 injections are transfection, and then I started hearing everyone use the term.
Transfection is artificially introducing DNA or RNA into cells utilizing means other than viral infection.
The C19 vaccines are not vaccines but transfection technology injected into the bloodstream.
Then I saw a short and simple post from Latypova.
A few key points from Latypova
There is no legal definition of what is a vaccine.
Once a chemical substance is declared a “infectious disease vaccine”, no matter what that chemical composition contains, is simply put into regulation-free and liability-free category.
The FDA is fully aware of the harms and dangers of gene therapy. Still, if a gene therapy product (transfection technology) is moved under a new heading of vaccines, different rules apply.
For the person who gets injected the risk of death and injury remains the same, but instead of being informed about it (as they would be if offered gene therapy), they are now being lied to and told it’s 100% safe!
Gene therapies cannot be mandated. Informed consent applies to gene therapies. And finally, manufacturers do face liability and that’s the best compliance enforcement one can hope for.
Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies apply to gene therapy designation and do not apply at all to vaccine designation, regardless of the technology used.
Can you see why they do not want to call the C19 injection a gene therapy?
In this short video, Dr. Shoemaker explains the dangers of transfection technology, which has been known for years as gene therapy. Researchers have found that RNA or DNA in LNP shortens the life span and has oncogenic properties.
They knew the harms but could get away with it by swapping labels.
But we have plenty of research to show the C19 injections are unsafe
The FDA does not have any statutory requirement to take these studies into account and they can continue authorizing the product!
It does not matter if studies show that the spike protein circulates in the body for over 700 days or that the more injections you receive, the more the immune response alters, possibly due to alterations in the IgG4 subclass.
They do not care that there are studies that have indicated the C19 gene therapy impacts fertility and the heart and increases autoimmune and cancer risk. They do not care that it can alter your DNA!
Furthermore, as Dr. Shoemaker and Dr. Trozzi explain, self-replicating injections contain RNA that behaves like DNA. People can transmit this to you through bodily fluids and possibly just by being in your vicinity; thus, there may be no way of escaping it.
All perfectly legal but criminal!
When doctors, the FDA, the CDC, and so forth tell you with a smile that the C19 injections are safe, they know the truth, but what they say is legal based on the broad vaccine definition.
Watch this podcast for details on the deception that is right in front of us, on paper, in the literature.
Listen to this long (over 2 hours) but very worthwhile Doc Malik podcast, in which the interviewee discusses the mechanisms of action of C19 injections as cancer-causing products. He shows us the literature (pulls up many studies on screen) and explains that manufacturers and the FDA are not hiding from us that these injections are gene therapy. It is there in black and white—we have to read it! In the last 45 minutes of the interview, he shares research supporting the autism-vax connection.
What about efficacy?
Evidence that physical illness is not always related to a pathogen
This post only touched on the deception surrounding safety.
Perhaps you got sick or witnessed loved ones getting very ill. Maybe you were stressed or living in fear after watching people dropping dead on the streets of China.
Rather than go into the injection’s efficacy, here is information that indicates that fear is a potent modulator of physical illness and how it can become “contagious.”
Read this article from 2006 from Homeland Security describing how fear of a terrorist attack could induce physical illness symptoms.
Here is one example they provide, but several others are in the article.
In December 2005 a mysterious illness marked by headache, fever, faintness, and numbness in extremities occurred in 13 school children in the Shelkov region of Chechnya.
Many believed the illness was caused by a Russian chemical weapons attack, which precipitated the rapid spread of similar symptoms throughout the region.
Medical officials determined the episode was a case of psychosomatic contagion—mass psychogenic illness—brought on by anxiety over Russian military activities in the area. There is no evidence the illnesses were caused by chemical weapons.1,2,3,4,
Stress and how it can lead to physical illness symptoms
In this presentation on all-cause mortality, Denis Rancourt discusses how stress can induce physical ailment symptoms and even death. At the 19:30 and 26-minute marks, he mentions Hans Selye, who said that the three stages of the general adaptation syndrome to stress are an alarm reaction, adaptation to resistance, and exhaustion if the adaptation continues for too long.
Lastly,
This template can be provided to your state legislatures as a tool for removing transfection injections in your state.
Amanda Vollmer provided links to 75 studies on vaccination and their associated harm/dangers.
Bottom Line: Informed consent does not exist and probably never will.
The transfection technology injected into you is harmful, and “they” know it.
Stay informed.
My posts will remain free in 2025. I do not post on mainstream social media. In fact, this is the ONLY place I post!
Show my posts some love if you enjoy them by buying me a cup of tea or a paid subscription, as it takes much of my free time to read, research, and write these posts.
Please share, comment, and like my posts and help spread the word about health misconceptions.
Thank you. Excellent post! Helpful details clearly explained. Soooooooo glad I didn't take the jab! Whew.
I'll keep this post in mind should a normie ever want to talk with me about the subject.